Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Lok Ranjan, A
Prabu Dayal Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary, Government Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's previous and current pay scales differ. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. macp eligibility requires direct appointment in a higher pay scale. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court clarifies that prior service in lower positions cannot affect macp benefits. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. interpretation of the law surrounding service counting for macp upgradations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. judgment dismisses claims based on previous service being considered for financial upgradation. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
Per : Hon’ble Shri Lok Ranjan, Member (A)
The present Original Application had been filed by the Applicant upon being aggrieved by the communication dated 03.01.2014 of the Additional Commissioner (C.C.U.) (Respondent No.4) addressed to the Assistant Development Commissioner, Jaipur Special Economic Zone – whereby it was conveyed that the Pay Scale of the post of Inspector Central Excise, which the Applicant had joined w.e.f. 10.12.1984, was higher than that of the post of Sub-Inspector, Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) in which he previously worked w.e.f. 27.06.1983 to 07.12.1984 ; and that the period of his previous service as Sub-Inspector C.B.I. was not to be counted towards
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
