Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, A, Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Ms. Priyanka Rawat – Appellant
Versus
GNCT of Delhi & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's initial employment details and delays in the appointment process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments presented by the applicant's counsel regarding entitlement to notional seniority. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. discussion on the delays and the legal principles regarding notional benefits. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. court's decision favoring the applicant's claim for notional seniority. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 5. final ruling and directions to the respondents. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
ORDER
As Per: Hon’ble Ajay Pratap Sing, Member (Judicial)
Applicant is working as Speech Therapist by means of this application has invoked jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking directions to the respondents to grant notional seniority from the date of last candidate appointed including pay fixation with all consequential benefits including notional increments and benefits under MACP Scheme w.e.f. November, 2016 and to rectify the Board recommendation meeting dated 06.04.2022 along applicant’s joining to 2016 instead of 10.05.2022.
FACTS IN BRIEF
2. The DSSB issued employment notific
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
