Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta (Sen), Suchitto Kumar Das, JJ
Ramapati Barman – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the applicant's service and allegations. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural irregularities in disciplinary action. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis and reasoning regarding the disciplinary proceedings. (Para 5) |
| 4. final conclusion dismissing the applicant's appeal. (Para 7) |
Hon’ble Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
“a) The order dated 5th September, 2018 passed by the respondent no. 2 being Annexure-A-23 hereof, be set aside and quashed;
c) The purported charge-sheet dated 9th March, 2015 issued against the applicant, being Annexure- A-3 hereof, be set aside and quashed;
e) The purported order of suspension dated 18th February, 2015 passed by the respondent no. 5 being Annexure- A-2 hereof be set aside and quashed;
g) The respondents and each of them be directed to immediately reinstate the applicant in the post of Postal Assistant in Contai Coastal Division with full back wages;
i) Such further and/or other order or orders be passed and/or direction or directions be given, as to this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper.”
The applicant was appointed as a Postal Assistant in Contai Postal Division on 22.08.1990 and was confirmed in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
