Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajnish Kumar Rai, J
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through General Manager, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought for compassionate appointment based on financial hardship. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. discussion on delays due to prior disputes and legal launders regarding succession. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal considerations and precedents regarding the timeliness of compassionate appointment claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final decision on delaying the application for compassionate appointment. (Para 10) |
ORDER
By way of the present O.A., the applicant has sought the relief for compassionate appointment on the ground that his father Late Ramanand Singh died on 22.10.2003. The O.A. is supported by Misc. Application No. 3012/2023 i.e. Delay Condonation Application explaining the delay and laches in filing the O.A. The relief sought under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is quoted below: -
“(ii) To issue an order or direction in the suitable nature directing the respondent department to consider the appointment of applicant on compassionate ground under the dying-in-harness rules within stipulated period of time which may be specified by this Hon’ble Tribunal.
(iii) To issue any order or direction, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the fact
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
