Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS, J
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on applicant's service and previous oas. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against regularization. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's binding adherence to uma devi judgment. (Para 5) |
| 4. conclusion: oa dismissed. (Para 6) |
ORDER
By the Court:
By filing the instant OA, the applicant is seeking direction against the respondents to regularize his services on the post of Group ‘D’. He has also prayed to quash the order dated 25/26.06.2012 (Annex. A/1), whereby, while complying with the directions issued in OA No. 249/2009 filed by the applicant, after examining the case of the applicant in light of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Secretary, State of Karnataka And ...vs Uma Devi & Ors, 2006 (4) SCC 1, the claim of the applicant for regularization was dismissed on merit.
2. The facts necessary to adjudicate this OA are as under:-
2.1 The applicant was engaged as casual labour under respondent No. 2 & respondent No. 3. As per the case of the applicant, he was working against the sanctioned Group ‘D’ post in the respondents’ department since 15.05.1996. Aggrieved with not considering his case for regularization, he filed OA No. 249/2009 before this bench with a pray
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
