SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5767

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J, MRS. MALLIKA ARYA, A
Rajkumar Nagesh – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Ministry of Railway Department – Respondent
Original Application No.200/1187/2022 | Original Application No.200/42/2023 | Original Application No.200/43/2023 | Original Application No.200/69/2023 | Original Application No.200/70/2023 | Original Application No.200/178/2023 | Original Application No.200/179/2023 | Original Application No.200/202/2023 | Original Application No.200/80/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Pravesh Naveriya, Shri Arun Soni, Shri Surendra Pratap Singh, Shri Satyendra Kumar Patel, Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: Shri N.K. Mishra, Shri D.S. Baghel

Minimum educational qualifications must be met for employment assistance claims by land losers, and discretion to relax these qualifications is limited.

Headnote:(A) Establishment Rule No.183/2010 - Employment assistance for land losers - Minimum educational qualifications required for appointment in Level-1 of the pay matrix - Applicants did not meet the minimum educational qualifications, leading to rejection of their claims. (Paras 2, 4, 5, 6, 8)

(B) Discretionary powers of General Manager - The General Manager has the authority to relax educational qualifications, but this discretion has been restricted by subsequent clarifications from the Railway Board. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The applicants claimed employment assistance due to land acquisition but were rejected for not meeting educational criteria. (Paras 1-3)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the rejection of applicants' claims as they did not possess the required qualifications at the time of application. (Paras 4-6)

Issues: Whether applicants were eligible for relaxation of educational qualifications for employment assistance. (Paras 4-5)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicants' lack of minimum educational qualifications at the time of consideration justified the rejection of their claims. (Paras 5-6)

Result: All Original Applications are dismissed.

Table of Content
1. claims for employment assistance due to land acquisition were rejected based on lack of educational qualifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court upheld the rejection of claims, affirming the necessity of meeting minimum educational qualifications. (Para 4)
3. the court ruled that lack of qualifications at the time of application justified rejection. (Para 5)
4. final ruling dismissed all applications without costs. (Para 6)

C O M M O N O R D E R 

By Akhil Kumar Srivastava, Member (J).

The applicants in these Original Applications are aggrieved that they have not been provided employment assistance in lieu of their acquired land. Since the issue involved in all these nine Original Applications is common as the case of the applicants therein has been rejected on the ground of non consideration of their cases due to not meeting the minimum educational criteria, we propose to decide these OAs by way of a common order. For the purpose of this order, the pleadings and the documents annexed with OA 200/1187/2022 have been referred to for brevity.

2. The respondents, in their reply, have stated that the instruction contained in para 5 of Establishment Rule No. 183/2010 provides that the applicant should normally fulfill the eligibility and other conditions Page 7 of 11 ANUPAM 2025.05.27 prescribed for the post against direct recruitment quota from open market. In special cases, General Manager of the Railway can relax these conditions, and in respect of educational qualifications, applicant with read/write only capability shall also be considered. Further, as per the instructions contained in RBE No. 129/2013 (Estt Rule No. 216/2013) minimum educational qualification for recruitment in Pay Band-1 of 5200- 20200 (GP 1800/-) will be 10th pass or ITI or equivalent or National Apprenticeship Certificate granted by NCVT and these new instructions will be applicable for all future recruitment henceforth against direct recruitment quota through all modes. However, vide PCPO/BSP's letter No. P-HQ/RUL/101/8 (E52606) dated 03.02.2022 and P-HQ/RUL/101/8/259 dated 26.07.2022, it is clarified that no appointment of land losers shall be entertained by granting relaxation of requisite minimum educational qualifications required for appointment in Level-1. The applicants in all these cases do not fulfill the minimum educational qualifications required for appointment. Since no recruitment/appointment of land losers shall be entertained by granting relaxation of requisite minimum educational qualifications for appointment in Level-1 of the pay matrix, the claim of the Page 8 of 11 ANUPAM 2025.05.27 applicants for offering of employment assistance against acquisition of land has been rejected.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records carefully.

4. The issue regarding grant of relaxation to the persons who do not fulfill the minimum educational qualification required for appointment has recently been decided by this Tribunal vide common order dated 21.03.2025 passed in Original Applications Nos.284/2025 & other connected OAs observing as under:

“6. The Establishment Rule No.183/2010 dated 13.10.2010 (Annexure R- 2) provides for appointment of land losers affected by land acquisition for Railway projects. While Para 5 of the said instructions clarifies that the applicant should normally fulfill the eligibility and other conditions as is required against direct recruitment quota from open market, a discretion has been given to the General Manager to relax the condition that in respect of educational qualifications, applicant with read/write only capability shall also be considered. Further, Establishment Rule No.216/2013 dated 13.12.2013 (Annexure R-5) provides minimum educational qualification for all recruitments against direct recruitment quota through all modes as 10th pass, or ITI or equivalent.

7. The Discretionary power as has been conferred to the General Manager vide RBE No.183/2010 has been reviewed after iss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top