Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
RAJVEER SINGH VERMA, J
Ricky Robin Surin – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Steel Authority of India Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. circumstances leading to the applicant's claim for compassionate appointment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments regarding the denial of compassionate appointment. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 23) |
| 3. court's reasoning for quashing the rejection of the applicant's claim. (Para 27 , 33) |
| 4. court's observations on the application of policy and precedents. (Para 28 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. final decision and disposal of the oa. (Para 34 , 35) |
O R D E R
PER:-RAJVEER SINGH VERMA, MEMBER [J]
1. Brief facts of the case are that thefather of the applicant, namely Late Walter Surin, was employed as an Office Attendant with the respondent and was admitted to Gua Hospital (owned and managed by the respondents) on 28.09.2020. He passed away on 29.09.2020.
2. In the year 1997, the applicant’s father was diagnosed with grave ailments and was referred to CMC-Vellore, where he underwent a kidney transplant in the same year.
3. Despite undergoing a renal transplant, the applicant's father continued to discharge his duties, though he was required to visit CMC- Vellore regularly for treatment and check-ups.
4. Since the year 2014, the applicant’s father began to experience ot
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
