Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, J, Mr. Mohan Pyare, A
Bechan Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Communication & I.T. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment criteria based on merit. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims of forgery contested by respondents. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. verification of documents was crucial. (Para 9) |
| 4. court found the appointment valid. (Para 10) |
| 5. final ruling upheld the validity of the appointment. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
Shri Avnish Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Subhash Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the official respondents and Shri Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5, were present at the time of hearing.
2. The instant original application has been filed seeking following relief:
“(i) To issue order or writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order of appointment of the Respondent No. 5 made vide Annexure No. A-1, based on fraud, forgery and mis-representation.
(ii) To issue order in the nature of writ of mandamus ordering Respondents to appoint the applicant on the post of G.D.S. B.P.M. Piparpanti Tewari.
(iii) To award cost of litigation against the respondents in favour of the applicant. However, Respondent No. 6 and 7 shall not be responsible for costs, if they do not contest the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
