SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 6720

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Anjani Nandan Sharan, JJ
Akhtar Raza – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi – Respondent
Original Application No.401 of 2022 | Original Application No.556 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ashish Srivastava, Shri Sunil, Shri Santosh Kumar Kushwaha
For the Respondents: Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma

Administrative errors in promotion evaluations can be rectified according to due process, and promotions based on such errors are deemed invalid.

Headnote:(A) Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Cancellation of promotion - The Tribunal held that the promotion of the applicant was based on erroneous evaluation of examination marks, leading to his reversion to the original post. The selection process was invalidated due to procedural irregularities, aligning with the Railway Board's guidelines. (Paras 16, 22, 30)

(B) Administrative Errors - The Tribunal emphasized that administrative errors can be rectified at any time, provided due process is followed. The applicant's right to promotion was not absolute if based on incorrect evaluations. (Paras 30, 32)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was promoted as Assistant Material Manager but was reverted after a calculation error in a fellow candidate's marks was discovered, which affected the selection process. The selection process was cancelled, and the applicant's promotion was deemed erroneous.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found the cancellation of the promotion and selection process justified due to the administrative error in the evaluation of examination marks.

Issues: The main issues included the legality of the cancellation of the promotion and whether the applicant had a vested right to promotion despite the error.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal ruled that mistakes in administrative processes can be corrected, and promotions based on such errors are not valid. The applicant was given an opportunity to respond to the proposed cancellation before the order was passed.

Result: Both Original Applications dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of promotion and cancellation (Para 1 , 3 , 5)
2. counterarguments regarding promotion eligibility (Para 6 , 7)
3. arguments of respondent-5 on promotion claim (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. applicant's arguments against cancellation (Para 12)
5. official respondents' defense of cancellation (Para 13 , 14)
6. court's observations on procedural correctness (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. legal principles regarding erroneous promotions (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. mistakes can be corrected legally (Para 32)
9. conclusion on dismissal of applications (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)

ORDER

By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-

The applicant in O.A. No.556/2022 and respondent-5 of O.A. No.401/2022 is same person.

2. Heard Shri Ashish Srivastava assisted by Shri Sunil, learned counsel for the applicant and respondent-5 in person in Original Application No.401/2022, Shri Santosh Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel appeared for the applicant in O.A. No.556/2022 and Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the official respondents in both the cases.

Original Application No. 401/2022

3. The Original Application No. 401/2022 under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:

I. This Tribunal may be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 02.05.2022 passed by respondent-2.

II. This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the applicant to continue on his post of Assistant Material Manager.

III. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, may be given in favour of the applicant.

4. The Original Application No.556 of 2022 has been filed by the applicant (hereinafter referred as ‘Respondent-5’) for the following reliefs:-

(i) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to quash the part concerned of cancellation of the whole examination from the Pre-qualifying stage of the impugned order dated 02.05.2022 passed by respondent-2.

(II) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass an order/orders to vacate the stay order dated 12.05.2022 regarding stay of Shri Akhtar Raja as AMM and further also pass the order/orders for the recovery of financial gain and accessed financial gain in terms of other facilities availing by Shri Akhtar Raja as given by the Department on ab initio void promotion as Assistant Material Manager.

(iii) This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to pass an order/orders/direction to respondent to promote the applicant to the post of AMM which got vacant by revertion of unfit candidate Shri Akhtar Raja.

(iv) Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, may given in the favour of the applicant.

Facts of the cases:-

5. The brief facts of the case as narrated in Original Application No.401/2022 is that the respondent-3 issued a Notification dated 23.10.2020 notified one unreserved post of Assistant Material Manager Group-B against 30 % quota vacancy for Stores Department. As per the Notification, a candidate working in the pay band of PB-2 (9300-34800/- +Grade Pay of Rs.4200) and above with five years of non fortuitous service in the grade would be eligible to appear in the selection. As per Railway Board Letter dated 19.03.2019, the aforesaid selection has to take place in Pre-qualifying written examination and main written examination and also the candidate securing 75% and above in the Pre- qualifying shall be eligible to appear in the main examination and number of candidate should be restricted five times of number of vacancies in order of merit and the main examination will be of descriptive paper on professional subject. In view of the above, the applicant as well as respondent-5 submitted their application for promotion by way of the aforesaid examination.

5.1 As per the Notification/Scheme, the candidates securing merit in pre qualifying examination would became e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top