CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B.K. Shrivastava, J, Sanjiv Kumar, A
Rendla Mounika, Thummalapalli Naga Teja Shirisha, Prashansa Tiwari, Sanaboina Venkata Siva Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Central Silk Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed for re-conducting skill test. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. applicants' claims regarding skill test difficulties. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of skill test conduct and objections. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. principles of waiver and estoppel in examination challenges. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. court's findings on examination conduct and validity. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. order dismissing the application. (Para 23) |
ORDER
PER: JUSTICE B.K. SHRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (J)
1. This OA has been filed by 4 applicants on 05.07.2024 for setting aside the reply dated 26.06.2024 and also for re- conducting the skill test. The reliefs claimed in para 8 of the OA are as under:-
“A. Issue writ, writs in the nature of direction to setting aside CSB reply dated 26.06.2024 (annexure- A1) and he Notice of final result dated 07.06.2024 for the recruitment of Stenographer (Grade-I) vide ANNEXURE-A1 issued by Central Silk Board with the direction to re-conduct the ‘Skill Test’ for the same set of candidates who attended the skill test on 19.12.2023 as has been already done by CSB by way of re-conducting the skill test for UDC candidates / aspirants on January 3 and 4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.