Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, J, DR. SANJIV KUMAR, A
K.K. Ananda Babu, M.P. Saravanan, Govindanarayanaswamy, S. Jameel Ahmed, Smt. Gowda Umadevi Ramulingappa, J. Tharuna Kumar, J. Balachander – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants' pca claims and historical context. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. dispute over pca eligibility and justification. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on pca eligibility and recommendations. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. order for re-examination of pca claims. (Para 17) |
ORDER (ORAL)
PER: JUSTICE S. SUJATHA, MEMBER (J)
This application is filed by the applicants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Quash the order Office Order F. No. 5/1/24/2019- 23/Estt/Vol. VII dated 16.06.2023, issued by the respondent No. 3, Annexure-A11 and the Office Memorandum F. kavya shree k CAT, kavya shree Bangalore No.5/1/24/2019-2024/Estt/Vol.VII/18 dated 19.02.2024, issued by the respondent No. 3, Annexure-A15.
(ii) Direct the respondents to restore payment of Patient Care Allowance to the applicants with effect from 01.06.2023 at the rate of Rs. 4100/- per month with the payment of interest at 12% p.a. on the amount due and
(iii) Grant such other relief deemed fit, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Briefly stated the facts as narrated by the applicants are that the Applicant Nos. 1 to 3 were appoint
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
