Essar Ali Sk, Kalipada Malakar, Parsanath Haldar, Rasul Ali Sk, Moslem Munshi, Sambhu Ch. Mondal, Gopal Ch. Mondal, Anech Sk, Trinath Ch. Baidya, Md. Amjad Ali Sk, Bikash Ch. Roy, Eradul Munshi, Laltu Sk, Asraf Ali Munshi, Khosdel Sk, Nimai Baidya, Mujibar Munshi, Lalan Sk, Nityan Karmakar, Guljer Mallick, Hiyat Sk, Mustafa Ali Sk, Majid Ali Sk, Mojammel Sk, Sunil Ch. Mondal, Ayub Sk, Diljar Sk, Amir Mallick, Prasanta Biswas, Rustam Sk, Sudhir Gharami, Noorjaman Sk, Gurupada Biswas, Manik Sk, Chatu Ghosh, Subal Roy, Atul Roy, Hassan Mondal, Subrata Ghosh, Shyamal Karmakar, Jahar Sk., Swapan Ghosh, Sunita Dey, Hamjer Ali Sk vs Union of India, The Secretary (Tech), Regional Development Office, Central Silk Board, The Director, National Silkwork Seed Project, The Member Secretary, Central Silk Board, Director, National Silkwork Seed Project

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 7131

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta, Suchitto Kumar Das, JJ
Essar Ali Sk, Kalipada Malakar, Parsanath Haldar, Rasul Ali Sk, Moslem Munshi, Sambhu Ch. Mondal, Gopal Ch. Mondal, Anech Sk, Trinath Ch. Baidya, Md. Amjad Ali Sk, Bikash Ch. Roy, Eradul Munshi, Laltu Sk, Asraf Ali Munshi, Khosdel Sk, Nimai Baidya, Mujibar Munshi, Lalan Sk, Nityan Karmakar, Guljer Mallick, Hiyat Sk, Mustafa Ali Sk, Majid Ali Sk, Mojammel Sk, Sunil Ch. Mondal, Ayub Sk, Diljar Sk, Amir Mallick, Prasanta Biswas, Rustam Sk, Sudhir Gharami, Noorjaman Sk, Gurupada Biswas, Manik Sk, Chatu Ghosh, Subal Roy, Atul Roy, Hassan Mondal, Subrata Ghosh, Shyamal Karmakar, Jahar Sk., Swapan Ghosh, Sunita Dey, Hamjer Ali Sk – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, The Secretary (Tech), Regional Development Office, Central Silk Board, The Director, National Silkwork Seed Project, The Member Secretary, Central Silk Board, Director, National Silkwork Seed Project – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. A. Neogi, Mr. B. Neogi, Mr. G. Singh, Mr. A.P. Deb
For the Respondents: Mr. A. Lahiri

Table of Content
1. eligibility for temporary status scheme (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments on service duration and jurisdiction (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. supreme court's view on regularization (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. perennial nature of work entitles temporary status (Para 14)
5. order for granting temporary status (Para 15 , 16)

Ms. Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:

“(a) An order directing the Respondents to confer the benefit of Temporary Status with effect from 1.7.2015 and to fix the pay of the applicants and also to allow the applicants all consequential service benefits,

The applicants were initially appointed as Casual Worker in the year 1993 and are continuing in service of Central Silk Board till date. Further, on 01.05.1995, the applicants were appointed as Time Scale Farm Worker/CFW. The applicants were also converted as Skilled Farm Worker on 15.11.2010 taking into account their ability to perform duties. Thus, they have been continuing in their place of work with only change of designation. During the year 1993, the Central Government framed a Scheme for granti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document