Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, J, Hukum Singh Meena, A
Ramesh Chandra Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of parties and background facts. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the applicant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of the disciplinary proceedings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's observations on equal treatment and proportional punishment. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. final decision and remittance for reconsideration. (Para 18) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Shri Jayesh V Bhairavia, Member (Judicial)
Being aggrieved with the Charge Memorandum dated 20.4.2011 (Annexure A/1) issued under Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965, the Inquiry Report dated 26.5.2012 (Annexure A/2), the UPSC’s advice dated 13.6.2014 (Annexure A/3) & the Disciplinary Authority’s order dated 10.9.2014 (Annexure A/4) imposing penalty upon the applicant of reduction to a lower scale in time scale of pay by two stages for a period of two years, with the further direction that the applicant will not earn increments of pay during the period of such reduction and after expiry of such period the reduction will not have the effect of postponing his future increments, as also being aggrieved with order dated 28.9.2015 (Annexure A/5) passed by the Revisionary Authority rejecting the appl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
