Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Umesh Gajankush, Santosh Mehra, JJ
Bharati M. Bakhtiani – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the applicants. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents' arguments in favor of reservation. (Para 3) |
| 3. limitations and jurisdictional issues. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's observations on the case. (Para 5) |
| 5. ratio decidendi concerning reservation policies. (Para 6) |
| 6. final conclusions and orders. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Per: Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
In the present OA, an issue has been raised in respect of grant of reservation in promotion and consequential seniority by challenging the impugned promotion (ad-hoc) order dated 23rd February, 2017 (Assistant Commissioner), impugned promotion (ad-hoc) order dated 11th May, 2018 (Assistant Commissioner) and impugned Seniority List dated 23rd September, 2019 by the applicants.
2. Brief facts of the case are that applicants were initially appointed on the post of Inspector through the Staff Selection Commission and their initial seniority was fixed as per the marks obtained by them in the said Selection Process.
2.1. It is submitted that they were superseded by the juniors (by the Reserved Candidates) at the relevant time of promotion, from the post of Inspector (Central Excise) to the post of Superintendent. However, the applicant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
