Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Umesh Gajankush, Member (Judicial), Shri Krishna, Member (Administrative)
Shri Sharad Shankarrao Jagdale – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through the Secretary, Railway Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. examination process and challenges related to promotion irregularities. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. final decision based on verification of claims against established procedures. (Para 6 , 8 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 3. judicial review must respect expertise in academic matters. (Para 10 , 18) |
ORDER
Per : Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant by seeking the following reliefs:
“1) This Hon’ble Tribunal will be pleased to call for the records of the case which led to the declaration of the Impugned Panel (A-1) & after going through its propriety & legality, be please direct the Respondent No.1 to amend it by the interpolating the name of the Applicant in the said Panel at appropriate place with its all Consequential benefits arising thereof.
2) Any other relief(s) that this Hon’ble Tribunal may thing deems fit.
3) Cost of the OA be ordered on the Respondents.”
2. Brief facts of the case are that while working as Chief Staff Welfare Inspector under the office of DRM (Personnel Branch) in Mumbai Division of Central Railway at CSMT Mumbai, the respondents had issued a notification for selection to the post of Asstt. Personnel Officer (in short
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
