SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 7465

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Ram Mohan Johri, JJ
Suresh Kumar, Manju Rani, Manju Gupta, Ram Paul, Santosh Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jammu and Kashmir through Chief Secretary, Government of J&K – Respondent
Transferred Application No. 61/743/2020 | Transferred Application No. 61/758/2020 | Transferred Application No. 61/761/2020 | Transferred Application No. 61/5354/2021 | Transferred Application No. 61/757/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not specified
For the Respondents: Not specified

The court established that recruitment must be merit-based and adhere to constitutional principles of equality and fairness, directing re-evaluation of candidates and verification of qualifications.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Recruitment of Physical Education Teachers - Petitioners challenged the selection process alleging exclusion despite merit and systemic irregularities - Court emphasized the need for merit-based selection and adherence to constitutional principles of equality and fairness. (Paras 2-12)

(B) Judicial Review - The Tribunal directed the respondents to consider petitioners for remaining vacancies, verify authenticity of certificates, and ensure no dual appointments, reinforcing the principle of fair recruitment. (Paras 10-12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, qualified candidates for Physical Education Teacher posts in District Kathua, were excluded from final select lists published in 2010, despite allegations of irregularities in the selection process.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found the selection process flawed due to the presence of candidates with questionable credentials and directed the consideration of petitioners for remaining vacancies.

Issues: The main issues were the legality and fairness of the selection process and the petitioners' entitlement to appointment against existing vacancies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the selection process was arbitrary and violated constitutional principles, necessitating a reassessment of candidates based on merit.

Result: Transfer Applications allowed with directions for re-evaluation and verification.

Table of Content
1. petitioners' claims for appointment. (Para 1 , 8)
2. recruitment process for physical education teachers. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. selection process must adhere to merit and fairness. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court's directive for verifying qualifications. (Para 12 , 14 , 15)

O R D E R

Per: - Sh. Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member The instant petitions were initially filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, and later on these were transferred to this Tribunal, and the petitioners had sought the following reliefs: -

Transferred Application No. 743 of 2020: -

i. to quash Final Select list issued by the respondents which was published in daily English Newspaper "Daily Excelsior" on 16.05.2010 by which the respondents have selected private respondent nos. 8 to 45 for the posts of Physical Education Teachers for District Kathua under open merit category, by issuance of writ of certiorari.

ii. to quash Notification No. DG-YSS/Estt/8197 dated 4.01.2011 which was published in daily English Newspaper "State Times" on 5.1.2011 by which the respondents have selected private respondent nos. 46 to 54 by operating the waiting list and ignored the petitioners who are more meritorious private respondents, by issuance of writ of certiorari,

iii. to issue directions to the respondents to consider the case of petitioners for appointment against the post of Physical Education teachers as the petitioners are qualified, more meritorious, trained and fully eligible and entitled for selection to the post of teachers in open merit category, by issuance of writ of mandamus;

iv. to issue directions to the respondents restraining them to implement Final Select list issued by the respondents which was published in daily English Newspaper "Daily Excelsior" on 20.02.2010 by which the respondents have selected private respondent nos. 8 to 45 for the posts of Physical Education Teachers for District Kathua under open merit category and restraining the respondents to adjust/appoint any person against the vacant post of Physical Education teachers in open merit category and also Notification No. DG-YSS/Estt/8197 dated 4.01.2011 which was published in daily English Newspaper "State Times" on 5.1.2011 by which the respondents have selected RAJAT private respondent nos. 46 to 54 by operating the SINGH waiting list and ignored the petitioners who are more meritorious than the private respondents, by issuance PATHANIA of writ of prohibition;

v. to issue directions to the respondents to produce the original records of selection before this Hon'ble Court by which the respondent have selected private respondents 8 to 54 for the post of Physical Education teachers in District Kathua, by issuance of writ of mandamus;

vi. to declare Final Select list issued by the respondents which was published in daily English Newspaper "Daily Excelsior" on 16.05.2010 by which the respondents have selected private respondent nos. 8 to 45 for the posts of Physical Education Teachers for District Kathua under open merit category and ignored the petitioners who are qualified and more meritorious and trained in the field and Notification No. DG- YSS/Estt/8197 dated 4.01.2011 which was published in daily English Newspaper "State Times" on 5.1.2011 by which the respondents have selected private respondent nos. 46100539 by operating the waiting list and ignored the petitioners who are more meritorious than the private respondents, as ultra virus, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and contrary to the provisions of law and Rules and against the provisions of principles of natural justice, by issuance of writ of mandamus;

OR

vii. to issue any other writ, order or directions which the Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners and against the respondents with costs.

Transferred Application No. 758 of 2020: -

i. to fnal quash Select list issued by the respondents which was published in daily En

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top