Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Justice Ranjit More, Chairman, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Sh. Rama Shankar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court proceeding acceptance of oa for final hearing. (Para 1) |
| 2. suspension challenged due to lack of chargesheet. (Para 2 , 3 , 8) |
| 3. arguments on the relevance of amended rules. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 4. court review of legal framework surrounding suspension and charges. (Para 6) |
| 5. applicability of the amended suspension period. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 6. reinstatement directive issued for excessive suspension. (Para 11 , 14) |
| 7. application of time limits on suspensions and rulings regarding applicant's case. (Para 13) |
| 8. final ruling providing for the reinstatement of the applicant. (Para 15) |
Per: Justice Ranjit More, Chairman:
Having regard to the short controversy involved in the present matter, the OA has been taken up for final hearing with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. We, accordingly, heard Mr. S. K. Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. V. S. R. Krishna, learned counsel for respondent no.2, and Mr. Thakur Virender Pratap Singh Charak, learned counsel for respondent no.1.
2. By this OA, the applicant is challenging the suspension order dated 10.08.2024 and the subsequent order dated 23.10.2024 by which the suspension was extend
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
