Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Justice Ranjit More, CJ, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, J
Satya Gopal IAS(AGMUT:1988)(Retd) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through home Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs North Block, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to disciplinary action based on charge memorandum. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's request for documents to prepare defense. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents' opposition to document access. (Para 6) |
| 4. disciplinary authority's powers and obligations under rules. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. right of access to documents for fair defense. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. natural justice and the need for document access. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. orders allowing access to documents and time for defense. (Para 15) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Per: Justice Ranjit More, Chairman
Considering the limited scope of the dispute and with the consent of the learned counsel for both parties, we propose to dispose of this Original Application (OA) finally.
2. The applicant challenges the letter dated 12.06.2025 issued by Respondent No. 1. Additionally, the applicant seeks consequential directions for Respondent No. 1 to provide the documents requested vide letter dated 02.06.2025, necessary for preparing the written statement of defence against the chargesheet dated 16.05.2025.
3. The relevant facts leading to this OA are as follows:
The applicant was served a memorandum of charge dated 16.05.2025 on 17.05.2025, containing a single Ar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
