Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajveer Singh Verma, J, Kumar Rajesh Chandra, A
Ratnesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India Through the Director General, Indian Council of Agricultural Research – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of applicant's removal from service (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural fairness and authority (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 3. court's analysis on inquiry process and legal standards (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. supreme court's precedent on inquiry requirements (Para 29 , 30) |
| 5. final orders and directions for reinstatement (Para 31 , 32) |
Per:- Rajveer Singh Verma, Member [J]
“8.1 That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the Orders dated 20.08.2018 passed by the Respondent No.2 as contained in Annexure A/11 together with Removal from Service Order dated 03.10.2013 passed by the Respondent No.3 as contained in Annexure-A/7 together with Inquiry Report dated 30.07.2013/07.09.2013 as contained in Annexure-A/6.
8.3 Any other relief or reliefs including the cost of the proceeding may be allowed in favour of the Applicant.”
3. While working under Respondent No.4, applicant received one Charge Memorandum dated 04.01.2013 (Annexure-A/2) under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 alleging misconduct behavior of the applicant. It is also stated by the applicant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
