Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MRS. JUSTICE S SUJATHA, J, DR.SANJIV KUMAR, A
Shri M.S.Ganesh – Appellant
Versus
The Surveyor General of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of applicants and their service history. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding macp benefits and pay matrix. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on macp and pay fixation. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. final order and conclusions of the court. (Para 19) |
O R D E R
The applicants have filed this application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
(b) quash the impugned order No.4038/1092 dated 11.08.2021 at Annexure A15 issued by R-1 and impugned order No.SM/02/02//2021 dated 25.08.2021 at Annexure A17 issued by R-2 and impugned order No.14/1902-MACP (Genl) dt.30.11.2021/03.01.2022 at Annexure A18 issued by R-1 and impugned order No.05 (Adm) dated 17.03.2022 at Annexure A20 issued by R-3 as arbitrary, unjust, unfair and bad in law and against the orders of the Hon’ble Apex court at Annexure A19.
(d) pass any other order or direction as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Tribunal including an order for award of cost of this application in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. Learned Counsel Shri B.S.Venkatesh Kumar representing the applicants argued that the applicants were holding the Gra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
