SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 7741

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anindo Majumdar, ACJ, Rajnish Kumar Rai, J
Ashok Kumar Pramanik – Appellant
Versus
The General Manager South Eastern Railway – Respondent
O.A. 350/00705/2025 | M.A. 350/00462/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Bharat Bhushan
For the Respondents: Mr. B.K. Banerjee

The court emphasized the necessity for timely consideration of representations concerning employment under the land loser quota.

Headnote:The judgment addresses an Original Application concerning employment requests made under the land loser quota. The applicant sought directions to the respondents to consider previous representations regarding employment. The court directed the respondents to consider the representations within a specified timeframe, not addressing the case's merits. The applicant's plea for expediency was acknowledged and a directive issued. "There will be no order as to costs."

Table of Content
1. the applicant seeks relief concerning employment. (Para 2 , 3)
2. counsel requests timely action on representations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court directs consideration of representations. (Para 6 , 7)
4. final ruling on the application. (Para 8)

Per: Mr. Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member:

The applicant has filed this Original Application, seeking the following relief(s):

“a) Direction upon the respondent no. 2 to consider the representation dated 23.09.2024 & 18.04.2025 and upon consideration call letters for the appointment under land loser quota may be issued.

b) Production of records;

c) Any other order or orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deems fit & proper.”

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had earlier filed representations dated 23.09.2024 to the Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kharagpur praying for providing employment in favour of his son, Sandip Pramanik under Land Loser category in respect of the Deshpran Nandigram Special Railway Project.

3. Ld. Counsel further submits that the applicant had submitted another representation dated 18.04.2025 (Annexure A/9) to the General Manager, South Eastern Railway and other Respondent Authorities on the same issue.

4. Ld. Counsel further submits that the applicant has not received any reply on the aforesaid representations. He also submits that he would be satisfied at this stage, if direction is issued to the respondents to consider the aforesaid representations and to take a decision on the same at the earliest.

5. Mr. B.K. Banerjee, Ld. Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents is present. He submits that he has no objection, if such direction is issued upon the respondent.

6. The competent respondent authority is directed to consider the representations of the applicant dated 23.09.2024 and 18.04.2025 as per the extant rules and policy within a period of 02 (two) months after receipt of a certified copy of this order.

7. It is made clear that we have not entered into the merits of the case and that all points are kept open for consideration.

8. The O.A. is accordingly disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top