Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J, Pramod Kumar Das, A
Sarbeswar Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of disciplinary proceedings based on derogatory remarks. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents' counter to the applicant's claims regarding the charge sheet. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding the validity of the charge sheet and potential bias. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's observations on natural justice and bias. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion to quash the charge sheet due to bias. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, MEMBER (J):
As it appears from record, the applicant submitted representation dated 08.06.2023 to the Superintendent of Post Offices, Mayurbhanj Division, Baripada raising his grievance concerning transfer and posting and praying for appropriate order as deemed fit and proper. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Mayurbhanj Division, Baripada on receipt of the said representation dated 08.06.2023, vide letter dated 15.06.2023 (A/4) called for explanation from the applicant stating therein as under:-
“With reference to your letter cited above, wherein you have raised your concern about non-relieving of one PA Cadre official whose name is at serial number 16 in Part-II of the Rotational transfer memo issued by this office for the year 2023-24.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
