CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J
Ku. Kamla Bai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement based on disability regulations. (Para 5) |
| 2. discussion on legal guardianship and criteria for pension. (Para 7) |
| 3. court's directive regarding pension sanction. (Para 8) |
O R D E R The applicant is that she has not been paid family pension of her father.
2. The applicant states that her father retired from service of the respondents w.e.f.30.06.1982. Soon after his retirement, the father of Page 1 of 6 2025.07.16 ANUPAM the applicant died on 07.11.1982. Thereafter, mother of the applicant was getting family pension and she also died on 07.09.2021. During her lifetime, the mother of the applicant had submitted an application requesting the respondents to record the name of the applicant as her dependent. The applicant submits that she is mentally retarted with 40% physical disability and was fully dependent on her mother. Since now she is dependent on her brother, the brother of the applicant has been declared as legal guardian of the applicant by the National Trust for Welfare of Person’s with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, New Delhi vide certificate dated 03.11.2021 (Annexure A-6).
2.1 The brother of the applicant submitted a representation dated 04.02.2022 (Ann
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.