Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SHRI SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, J, SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, A
Biswabijoyee Panigrahi (Retd. IRS) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relevant background and disciplinary actions against the applicant. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion regarding the charge sheets issued and the legal framework governing them. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. discussions on procedural fairness and legal standing of disciplinary actions. (Para 7 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. legal implications of rule 9 of ccs pension rules regarding disciplinary actions. (Para 14 , 16 , 19) |
| 5. court’s findings on the sustainability of the charge sheet under statutory limitations. (Para 15 , 17 , 20) |
ORDER
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
The factual aspects of the matter are that the applicant was a member of Indian Revenue Service of 1979 batch.
While working as Commissioner of Income Tax (A), he was granted study leave for a period of two years from 01.09.2003 to 31.08.2005 for pursuing Diploma in Information Technology at NIIT, Bhubaneswar vide OM dated 14.01.2004. Thereafter, he applied for extension of leave till 31.12.2005, which was declined by CCIT, Chennai with direction to report to duty. He then applied for EOL from 01.09.2005 to 30.04.2007 on medical grounds, which was refused vide letter dated 12.02.2007 with direction to join duty at Chennai on or before 24.12
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
