SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 7882

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. Umesh Gajankush, Member (J), MR. Shri Krishna, Member (A)
Mr. Shantaram Rajendra Gawade – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Administration of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Staff Selection Board, Silvassa – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.420 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Amardeep R. Bhattacharya I/b Bhattacharya Associates
For the Respondents: Dr. V.S.Masurkar

The tribunal ruled that applying UGC guidelines retrospectively to reject applications due to dual degrees is arbitrary and violates principles of fair recruitment.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Recruitment process for Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) - The applicant sought redressal against the non-selection for the post of PGT claiming compliance with the eligibility criteria despite having a dual degree - Court addressed the validity of UGC guidelines concerning dual degrees and emphasized fair consideration of candidates without arbitrary rejection. (Paras 14-17)

(B) Equivalency of Qualifications - The court discussed the nature of dual degrees and incongruities in UGC guidelines concerning retrospective application, ruling that UGC guidelines should not adversely affect candidates who completed their degrees prior to such notifications. (Paras 12-13)

Facts of the case:
The applicant applied for the PGT post indicated under Advertisement No.1/6/2018-SSB/Vol.II/07, clearly stating his dual degrees. His non-selection was attributed to a post facto application of UGC guidelines that disqualified dual degrees done before the issuance of standards which were applied retroactively. The applicant had been informed no such bar existed in the original advertisement which caused confusion regarding eligibility.

Findings of Court:
The court determined the dismissal of the applicant's candidacy was not justified as the reasons were based solely on the application of UGC guidelines which had no retrospective effect, ruling further that the respondents must reconsider the applicant's candidacy.

Issues: Whether the criteria for dual degrees were clearly defined in the recruitment advertisement and the applicable UGC guidelines' enforceability retrospectively.

Ratio Decidendi: The tribunal held that the guidelines of the UGC could not be used to unjustly exclude candidates who met the original application requirements, affirming the necessity of adhering to equitable recruitment practices.

Result: The applicant's case for reconsideration was accepted and the respondents were directed to reevaluate his application accordingly.

Table of Content
1. applicant's application details and qualifications. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments/statements supporting the applicant's qualifications. (Para 5)
3. court observation on ugc guidelines and its application. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. overall conclusion and directive regarding reconsideration for the applicant. (Para 16)

ORDER

Per : Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)

The present Original Application has been by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 by seeking the following reliefs :

“8(a). That direction may be given to the respondents to appoint the applicant for the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT).

8(b). That direction may be given to the respondent – authorities to either give provisional appointment to the applicant herein subject to the outcome of the present application or alternatively, keep adequate number of posts vacant for the applicant, to be filled only after the decision of the present application.

8(c). Issue ad-interim ex parte stay of the recruitment process bearing No.1/6/2018-SSB/Vol.II/07 for the post of Post Graduation Teacher (PGT) conducted by the respondent – authorities till the disposal of the present Application.

8(d). Pass such other order/orders as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case in favour of the applicant.”

2. Brief facts of the case are stated in the Original Application that a Advertisement bearing No.1/6/2018-SSB/Vol.II/07 dated 25.01.2020 published by the Union Territory Administration of Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Staff Selection Board) on their official website for the post of Post Graduation Teacher (PGT) – Organization of Commerce – Marathi. The educational and other qualification essentials required for the post were mentioned in the Advertisement and the age limit was not exceeding 30 years.

2(a). The applicant had submitted an online application on 03.03.2020 on their Official Website of the respondent for the post Marathi along with the educational qualification details. The Applicant filled-up the prescribed form in the subject of PGT Organization of Commerce – Marathi after payment of requisite fees. In the application form, the applicant has clearly mentioned the year of both degrees, i.e., B.Ed (2016-2018) regular mode from BA Alias BhaisahebSawantAdhyapakMahavidyalaya, Mumbai University and M.Com (2017-2019) Open mode from Saheb Research Centre, Sawantwadi, Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University, Nashik.

2(b). It is stated that Union Territory Administration of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Directorate of Education, Secretariat, Daman has issued the office memorandum consisting of rules and regulations about the appointment of the Post- Graduation Teacher. The applicant further stated that the candidate who possessed two degrees in one academic year will be disqualified was not provided in the advertisement dated 25.01.2020. 2(c). Thereafter, online E-Admit Card was issued to the applicant with the details of venue of examination, reporting date and time of the examination along with the instructions to candidates for appearing in Computer Based examination for the aforesaid post. On 06.08.2021, the examination was conducted. Result was whereas, applicant's name appeared in the merit list.

2(d). On 30.08.2022, the respondents had issued a notice to all the concerned candidates on their Email IDs regarding verification of documents for the post of Post Graduate Teacher whose name appeared in the merit list. Accordingly, the applicant on 22.09.2022 has visited at Mini Conference Hall, Ground Floor, Secretariat Building, Silvassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and has handed over a set of documents to the concerned authority.

2(e). It is further stated that for the post of teachers in various subjects, the requisite educational qualification provides for two degrees, one should be Master's Degree and the other B.Ed or its equivalent.

2(f). Thereafter, on 21.10.2022, the list of selec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top