Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, J, Anjali Bhawra, A
Dayal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. misappropriation allegations with procedural challenges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. defendant's plea against procedural fairness and misconduct findings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 3. judicial review principles guiding administrative action. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. final judgment endorsing disciplinary authority's decision. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
ORDER
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. This O.A has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 against the impugned order of penalty dated 28.02.2022 (Annexure A-1), vide which the penalty of removal from engagement has been imposed on the applicant. The applicant is seeking the following reliefs:
“(a) call for relevant records from the respondents;
(b) declare that the impugned Order of Penalty issued vide Memo No. F-4/4/Bhandal Bet/19-20/Disc. Dt. 28.2.2022 (ΑΝΝEXURE A-1); Charge Sheet issued vide Memo No. F-4/4/Bhandal Bet/19-20 Dt. 05.2.2021 (ΑΝNEXURE A-2); Order-in-Appeal issued vide Memo No. STD-R/44-4/162/2022 Dt. 12.7.2022 (ΑΝNEXURE A-6) & Order-in-Revision, issued vide Memo No. STD-R/44-8/62/2022 Dt. 12.10.2022 (ΑΝΝEXURE A-8) are bad in law, illegal & void.
(c) q
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
