Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, Ram Mohan Johri, JJ
Rajat Singh Pathania – Appellant
Versus
State of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. representation has been submitted and rejected. (Para 2) |
| 2. no further cause of action due to prior consideration. (Para 3) |
| 3. tribunal affirms lack of jurisdiction after prior decision. (Para 4) |
| 4. petitioner free to seek further legal options. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
The instant petition was initially filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, and later on it was transferred to this Tribunal, and the petitioner had sought the following reliefs: -
RAJAT SINGH “i. issuing a writ of mandamus directing and PATHANIA commanding the respondents to grant the benefit of scheduled tribe to the petitioner under reservation Digitaly signed by RAJAT SINGH PATHANIA DN: C=IN, O=Central Administrative Tribunal Jammu Bench, OU=Stenographer Grade D, PostalCode=
180001, L=jammu, S=JAMMU AND KASHMIR, rules of the state and consequently grant retrospective STREET="Wazarat Road, Opposite Chief Secretary Camp office Jammu Jandk", Phone=
53b906b465d826ee1c1d19e3b6adaf29e74297b99762
1c778f2df2516f9d70fe, SERIALNUMBER= benefit of grade of special secretary w.e.f bdo selection c9dcf1f6ccd342a2ad4bd12ef417af4694d0c57afe8c3b c762c35a192f223826, E=rajat12sp@gmail.com, CN=
RAJAT SINGH PATHAN
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
