Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Manish Garg, J, Shri Rajinder Kashyap, A
Sh. Sunil Kumar Gaur MCM (Elect.) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Defence – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background on the applicant's service and entitlement. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by the applicant's counsel regarding macp. (Para 5) |
| 4. counterarguments by the respondents regarding macp and previous upgradations. (Para 6) |
| 5. court's analysis of the macp scheme. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. judicial precedents and interpretations of the macp scheme. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. court's decision on the entitlement of the applicant. (Para 17) |
| 8. final orders and directions issued by the court. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Since the issue involved in both the OAs are identical and the reliefs claimed are also same based on the similar grounds and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, we proceed to dispose of both the OAs by this common order.
3. By filing the OA No.947/2022 under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
B. To issue any other order or direction which this Hon‟ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
4. Brief facts of the case leading to filing of this OA are that the app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
