Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, J, B. Anand, A
Yogesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police Hqrs. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. applicant's argument on misconduct (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents' counterarguments (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal interpretation of misconduct (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's observations on responsibilities (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. court's findings and implications (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. final order and directions (Para 19) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. B. Anand, Member (A):
By way of filing this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:-
“(a) Quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 30.07.2020 (Annexure A/1) and dated 20.11.2019 (Annexure A/2) along with the findings/Inquiry Report (Annexure A/3)
(b) Direct the respondents to accord all consequential benefits including monetary and seniority benefits.
(c) Award costs of the proceedings in favour of the applicant.
(d) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit and proper in favour of the applicant.”
2. The brief factual matrix of the case is that the applicant, a fresh entrant into Police Force working as Sub Inspector, had arrested five antisocial elements, including one juvenile, on 29.01.2012 for certain offences. The appli
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
