Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S Khati, A
Chander Bhan – Appellant
Versus
DSIIDC Through its Managing Director – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants sought to enforce rights under prior judgments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition based on the nature of employment and prior grievances. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. long-term engagement does not guarantee regularization. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. emphasis on procedural adherence in grievance processes. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. tribunal's decision balances benefits with established legal parameters. (Para 12) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):-
Since a common question of facts and law is involved in the present batch of OAs, they are being disposed of through this common order. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted from O.A. No.2949/2024 and the same is taken as lead case in the present matter.
2. In the Original Application No.2949/2024, filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985, the applicants have prayed for the following relief(s):
“(a) To direct the respondents to extend the benefits of Judgment dt.2.6.2023 in OA No.407/21 followed Judgment dt.6.7.2023 in OA No.408/21 upheld vide Judgment dt.9.1.2024 in WP No.273/24 and implemented vide Orders dt.27.3.2024 to the applicants also being similarly placed;
(b) To direct
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
