Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Justice Om Prakash VII, J, Mr. Mohan Pyare, A
Laxmi Kant Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks quashing of penalty orders based on procedural violations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the applicant alleged wrongful framing and inquiry violations. (Para 5) |
| 3. court emphasized the necessity of adherence to procedural rules in inquiries. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. the disciplinary actions taken against a group are cited based on collective involvement. (Para 11) |
| 5. highlighting the invalidity of the inquiry based on failure to provide fair process. (Para 12 , 27) |
| 6. non-compliance with mandatory provisions of inquiry leads to vitiated outcomes. (Para 24 , 26) |
| 7. court ordered restoration of benefits and potential new inquiry. (Para 28) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
Shri Abhishek Tripathi and Shri Dharmendra Tiwari, learned senior counsel for the applicant and Shri R K Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents, were present at the time of hearing.
2. The instant original application has been filed seeking following relief:
“i. To consider for issuing orders or directions, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned Appellate Orders of penalty (02.03.2015) (A-1) and the original order dated 05.04.2013 (A-2) and the enquiry report da
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
