Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeeva Kumar, A, Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Ms. Shahida Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants sought to regularize their services. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents argued non-exhaustion of remedies prevents adjudication. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. section 20 mandates exhaustion of available remedies. (Para 10 , 12 , 15) |
| 4. court directed consideration of pending representations. (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER (ORAL)
As per: Ajay Pratap Singh, Member (Judicial)
M.A./3132/2025 Application filed by two applicants to file present O.A. jointly.
2. Present O.A. has been filed by two applicants, both working as Project Support Staff in CDAC Noida on CDAC pay roll on contractual basis, seeking common relief to set aside advertisement dated 14.06.2025 for post of Admn. Executive and Sr. Assistant and regularize their services with all consequential benefits.
3. In view of the averments made in the M.A./3132/2025 and common relief sought with common intention, applicants are granted permission to contest jointly.
4. M.A./3132/2025 is accordingly allowed and disposed of. O.A./2829/2025 Applicants working as contractual employees as Project Support Staff in Centre for Development of Advanced Computing, Noida by means of this application invoked jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Secti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
