Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta, J, Suchitto Kumar Das, ACJ
Gouranga Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s prayers and relief sought. (Para 1) |
| 2. 90-day extension validity governs suspension; timely review/extension within 90 days is essential; delays in communication do not automatically invalidate a valid extension. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. court recognizes extension as valid under rule 10; assessment focuses on compliance with 90-day window and the effect of timing of communication. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. oa dismissed; final order issued; no costs imposed. (Para 8) |
ORDER
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicant has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 , praying for the following relief(s) highlighting the facts of the case:
“(a) To quash and set aside the Order of extension of suspension dated 09.05.2023 (Annexure A-3) issued by respondent no.2 and declare the same to be invalid being violative of Rule 10(7) of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965.
(b) To reinstate the applicant after the expiry of suspension period of 90 days (09.05.2023) from the date of his initial suspension order i.e. from the 91st day (10.05.2023).
(c) To direct the respondents to make payment of monthly subsistence allo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
