Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Member-Administrative
Nand Kumar Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial penalties are valid until reduced on appeal, which changes their legal effect. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court confirms subsequent penalties shall reflect only the final, reduced status. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Per Hon’ble Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Member-Administrative In this case relating to punishment, the applicant has sought following reliefs:
“(i) That the Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 17.04.2013;
(ii) That the Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned orders dated 05.06.2013, 29.01.2015, 11.05.2015 and 27.07.2015;
(iii) Any other order or relief which is deemed and proper in the interest of justice may be passed in favour of the applicant.
(iv) Allow the present application with costs in favour of the applicant and against the opposite parties.”
2. We have perused the records and heard both the parties.
3. In brief, the applicant, while working under the respondents, was served a charge sheet dated 17.04.2013 under rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968 and was awarded minor penalty of withholding of increments of pay for three months vide order dated 05.06.2013 by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
