Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R N Singh, J, Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, A
HC (Exe.) Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCTD through Commissioner of Police, PHQ, I.P. Estate, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cctv footage was central to the charge against the applicant. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. legal principles emphasize that serious charges require definitive proof and fair process. (Para 4) |
| 3. allegations based on incomplete witness testimonies and missing key evidence. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. procedural violations undermine the integrity of departmental inquiries. (Para 16 , 20) |
| 5. final orders arise from the amalgamation of legal principles guiding the applicant's case. (Para 26 , 27) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A):
By way of this OA filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant has sought the following relief(s):-
“1. To quash and set aside the impugned Order initiating DE dt. 3.1.2013, Findings, Order of Punishment dt. 25.8.2014 and Appellate Order dt.13.1.2016.
2. To direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant in service with all consequential benefits including promotion/seniority and arrears of pay.
3. To award cost of the proceedings in favor of the applicant and
4. To pass such other and further orders as deemed it and proper in the circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice.”
2. Brief facts of the case are that a reg
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
