Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, J, Anjali Bhawra, A
Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the basis of the application and initial facts regarding the applicant's suspension. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenges regarding the subsistence allowance and applicant's financial hardships due to extension. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's observations on suspension validity considering ongoing investigations into allegations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. the tribunal's ruling on the matter and justification for the decision. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
Per: HON’BLE MRS. ANJALI BHAWRA, MEMBER (A):
1. This O.A has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“(b) Annexure A-1 dated 23.09.2022, Annexure A-5 dated 31.05.2022, Annexure A-6 dated 26.08.2022 and Annexure A-7 dated 28.11.2022 be quashed and set aside.
(c) It be declared that the applicant is entitled to increased Subsistence Allowance after 90 days and the same be paid to him from due date.”
2. The brief facts of the case as submitted by the applicant are as follows:
I. The applicant joined as Postal Assistant with respondent no.3 on 01.03.2020. The applicant while working as Sub Postmaster, Nither Post Office, an FIR No.33 of 2022 was registered at P.S. Nirmand, District Kullu on 01.06.2022
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
