SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10028

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SURESH KUMAR BATRA, J, RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, A
Sh. Sunil Rana son of Late Sh. Surjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through its Secretary Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi – Respondent
Original Application No.060/464/2020 | Original Application No. 54/2020 | Original Application No. 1033/2020 | Original Application No. 1034/2020 | Original Application No. 195/2021 | Original Application No. 1089/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rishav Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Goyal, Sr. CGSC

Promotions must reflect due dates based on eligibility; administrative delays cannot prejudice entitled employees.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - Promotion - Grant of promotional benefits - Applicants claimed promotion with benefits from the due date despite administrative delays - The respondents demurred but failed to justify discrimination against applicants compared to similarly situated employees - Legal standards mandate promotion benefits should commence from the date of eligibility in the event of administrative lapses. (Paras 6, 16, 22)

(B) Service Law - Applicants promoted as skilled employees - Entitlement to subsequent promotion after requisite service period and test - Promotions delayed due to administrative inaction - Court emphasized employer's duty to effect promotions timely and fairly in line with existing rules. (Paras 5, 15)

Facts of the case:
The applicants are Group C employees who sought promotion and consequential benefits on the argument of discriminatory non-implementation of promotional orders compared to peers who were promoted promptly from due dates. Reliance was placed on prior judgments supporting timely promotions.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the respondents failed to provide rationale for the delay and dissimilarity in granting promotions affecting the applicants adversely, constituting discrimination. Direction given for rectifying the benefits accordingly.

Issues: The core issue addressed was whether the applicants were entitled to promotion and financial benefits from respective eligibility dates, contrasting their treatment with others who received timely promotions.

Ratio Decidendi: The respondents were found arbitrary in denying benefits from the due dates of promotions, emphasizing that any administrative delays should not cause prejudice to the applicants, thereby enforcing principles of equality and timely rectification of benefits.

Result: The Original Applications stand allowed.

Table of Content
1. joint application for similar relief due to common grounds. (Para 1 , 2)
2. dispute over promotion eligibility and delay in benefits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. contention on discriminative practices in promotions. (Para 6 , 10)
4. legal review of promotion fairness and administrative delays. (Para 15 , 22)
5. outcome based on applicant discrimination. (Para 24)

ORDER

Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA MEMBER (J):-

1. The applicants in the above captioned six (06) Original Applications are claiming similar relief on the same grounds and the facts are also similar in all these OAs, therefore, these have been taken up for hearing together and disposed of by a common order, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. The applicants in these Original Application are claiming benefit of promotion and its consequential benefits from the date of commencement of vacancy year against which they have promoted and have sought quashing of orders whereby their seniority and financial benefits have been ordered to be effective from the date of assumption of charge of promoted post. For the sake of convenience and to avoid repetition of details, the facts are being taken from O.A. No. 464/2020 titled Sunil Rana and Others Vs. Union of India and Others. The relief, as claimed in this O.A. is as under:-

i) That the Annexures A-1 to A-4 dated 22.03.2019, 23.12.2019, 25.01.2020 and 04.02.2020 be quashed and set aside.

ii) It be declared that the applicants are entitled to promotion with all consequential benefits w.e.f. due date i.e. 01.04.2016 and 01.04.2018 respectively.

iii) It be further declared that once the promotion have been made after holding regular DPC against the regular vacancies the word ’adhoc’ mentioned in the promotion order be declared as misnomer.

3. The facts of the case (as taken from O.A. No. 464/2020), in nutshell, are that all the applicants are presently working as FGM HS-II Refg. Mechanic HS-II, Electrician HS Grade-II, Pipe Fitter HS Grade-II, Vehicle Mechanic HS Grade-II respectively under Respondent No. 3. All the applicants were promoted as Skilled Category in the year 2011- 2012 and 2014 respectively. The next channel of promotion of the applicants from the post of Skilled Grade is to that of Highly Skilled Grade-II and as per Rules Skilled Grade employee become entitled for promotion after rendering three years service and the criteria is for passing of relevant trade test. The applicants became eligible for promotion for the post of Highly Skilled Grade-II in the year 2015. The respondents convened DPC for promotion to various categories of the vacancies of the year 2014-2015 vide letter dated 14.09.2018 (Annexure A-6) and employees, who were within the zone of consideration, were promoted w.e.f. 01.04.2015 on adhoc basis. Their pay was fixed w.e.f. 01.04.2015 with all consequential benefits and their seniority was also ordered to be reckoned from 01.04.2015 as is evident from PTO No.39/2018 dated 24.09.2018 (Annexure A-7). They have also been paid arrears from 01.04.2015 as is evident from supplementary bill prepared on 14.01.2019 (Annexure A-8).

4. On the other hand, the applicants became eligible in 2015 but they come within the zone of consideration for the vacancies of the year 2015-2016 for which the DPC was conducted in 2019 and promotion order of the applicants were issued against the vacancy of the year 2015-2016 and the effective date of promotion is from 01.04.2016 but it has been mentioned in the promotion order that financial implication will be from the date of exemption of higher appointment and that seniority will also from the said date (Annexures A-1 to A-4). Similarly, number of other individuals namely Sh. Mewa Singh, MES No.370345, Sh. Jarnail Singh, MES NO.312817, Sh. Amarjit Singh, MES No.374490, Sh. Baldev Singh, MES No.374814, Sh. Rakesh Kumar, MES No.373545 were promoted along with applicants and their pay has been fixed by the respondents w.e.f. their date of eligibility and they have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top