Srinivassan.K vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, J, PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, A
Srinivassan.K – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. N.R.Routray
For the Respondents: Mr. A.C.Deo

Table of Content
1. summary of applicants' claims and circumstances leading to the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. overview of the respondents' arguments regarding the appointment terms and institutional regulations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. discussion on the entitlement of applicants to pay protection and regulations governing such claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's directive on the applicants' entitlement to pay protection. (Para 13)
5. final ruling and order regarding the case. (Para 14)

ORDER

PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):

Brief case of the applicants is that pursuant to notification dated 05.05.2017 (A/1) to fill up different category of non-faculty posts (Group-B), applicants applied and appeared at the selection. As per clause (viii) [Other information for the candidates] of the said notification, “the employees of the Institute will be governed by the New Pension Scheme as per the provision contained in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs (ECB & PR Division). Notification No. 5/7/2003-ECB& PR dated 22.12.2003. However, pay protection and continuation of past services of the existing Govt. employers selected to the post will be considered strictly as per t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALSUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, J, PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, ASrinivassan.K – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, J, PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, A
Srinivassan.K – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent