SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10216

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Kumar S Krishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
M/o Finance – Respondent


ORDER

Per Justice M.G.Sewlikar, Member (J)

Both these OAs are being disposed of by common judgment as the issues involved in both these OAs are identical. Facts in OA No.210/2020 are taken as a lead case.

2. Some of the applicants are working as Superintendent and the other applicants are retired Superintendents of Central Excise under the respondents.

3. Applicants are direct recruits Inspectors of Central Excise claiming 2nd Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) in Grade Pay [GP] of Rs.6600) and also promotee Inspectors of Central Excise claiming 3rd MACP in GP of Rs.6600). They are promoted as Superintendent, Central Excise, on different dates. They are given one or two promotions in their entire service of 30 to 36 or 38 years. Some of them have retired as Superintendents and some of them will be retiring as Superintendents.

4. The channel of promotion in Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) is that the Inspector of Central Tax and Central Excise is promoted as Superintendent of Central Tax and Central Excise and then promoted as Assistant Commissioner. As per Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme 1999, financial upgradations were granted on the basis of promoti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top