Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B. K. SHRIVASTAVA, J, SANTOSH MEHRA, A
Jamila Martins – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and claims for regularization. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents' arguments against regularization based on delay, false declarations, and lack of evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's review of evidence, precedents, and administrative guidelines regarding regularization. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. establishment of criteria for regularization and legal precedents supporting the applicant's case. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. order for regularization of the applicant's service. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
PER: MR. SANTOSH MEHRA, MEMBER (A)
This Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 to seek the following reliefs:
“(i) In view of the facts and grounds enumerated above, it is most respectfully prayed that the respondents may be directed to consider the applicant for regularisation from the date she completed ten years' service, with all consequential benefits.,
(ii) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may be issued in favour of the Applicant.”
2. The facts in nutshell of this case as per learned cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
