Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J, Mallika Arya, AM
Janardan Vishvakarma – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing and representation of parties. (Para 3 , 3) |
| 2. challenge of recruitment process by candidates. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 3. estoppel in challenging selection after participation. (Para 5) |
| 4. final decision on applicant's claims. (Para 6 , 7) |
3. Central Vigilance Commissioner, CVC, Satakata Bhawan, A- Block, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi - 110023. ………Respondents Advocate for the respondents: Shri A.P. Khare O R D E R By Akhil Kumar Srivastava, Member (Judicial) :-
Pursuant to the advertisement dated 21.08.2010 for filling the post of Labour (Quasi Skilled), the applicants applied and appeared in the written examination scheduled to be held on 21.09.2014. The result of the written examination was declared on 30.09.2014 in which the applicants were not find place. Therefore, the applicants have filed the instant original application for quashing the entire selection process mainly on the ground that the respondents have violated the condition shown at item no. 6 (C) of the advertisement dated 21.08.2010 (Annexure A-2). The applicants contended that the respondents have no right to change the conditions mentioned in the advertisement looking to the large strength of the can
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
