Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM, Mallika Arya, AM
Rakesh Sastya – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal basis for compassionate appointment and its proper procedural application. (Para 1 , 4 , 15) |
| 2. evaluating the financial hardship of the applicant's family post-breadwinner's death. (Para 2 , 5 , 12) |
| 3. the importance of timeliness and procedural compliance in seeking compassionate appointments. (Para 11 , 18) |
| 4. final decision confirming denial of application based on established guidelines. (Para 19) |
ORDER
By Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM:-
By means of the instant original application filed under section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, the applicant has prayed for quashing the orders dated 21.08.2012 and 18.10.2021 (wrongly mentioned in the relief clause as 12.08.2012 and 16.10.2021 respectively) and for a direction to the respondents to create a post for grant of appointment to him on compassionate grounds.
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that after the death of his father on 05.10.2009 while in service, the applicant filed an application for compassionate appointment alongwith requisite documents which was rejected by the Respondent no.2 vide order dated 21.08.2012 on the ground being not found indigent by the Circle Relaxation Committee. The ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
