SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10464

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R N Singh, J, Rajinder Kashyap, A
LAKSHMAN NYAYA VALIVETI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Tatini Basu, Mr. Abhijit Basu, Ms. Obulapuran Keerthi
For the Respondents: Ms. Dharam Deshna

Hon’ble Mr. R N Singh, Member (J):

1. In the present OA, the applicant is aggrieved by memorandum dated 30.01.2025 vide which a departmental proceeding under Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 has been initiated against him.

2. On bare perusal of the impugned memorandum, it is apparent that the same has been issued from the office of the respondents situated at Mumbai and the same is close to the applicant’s office through the Chairman, AERB having office at Mumbai and the applicant is admittedly residing in Austria. The applicant has signed and verified the present OA at Vienna, Austria. Prime-facia this Bench of the Tribunal is not having territorial jurisdiction in the matter.

4. At this stage, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant under instructions seeks permission to withdraw the present OA with liberty to the applicant to approach the appropriate Bench of this Tribunal in the matter.

6. Permission is granted. OA stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top