Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member
Lynda Vungngaihlun – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tribunal's authority to dispose of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim for the medical reimbursement and legal heirs. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's obligation to ensure reimbursement without unnecessary barriers. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. emphasis on spousal rights for reimbursement. (Para 9) |
| 5. decision to process the reimbursement claim. (Para 10) |
Per: Mr. Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member.
1. This matter is taken up by the Single Bench for disposal in a1c0c/o0r9d/a2n0c2e 1 wiistshu etdh e unodrdeer r Soufb -Stheect ioHno n’(b6l)e oCfh aiSremctaino,n C5A T ofd attehde Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , and since no complicated question of law is involved.
2. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, praying for the following relief(s):-
“(a) The Office Order dated 16.02.2003 issued by the Assistant Director of Postal Service (A/C’s), West Bengal Circle, Kol- 12 cannot be sustained in the eye of law and therefore the same may be quashed.
(b) An order do issue directing the respondents to release Rs. 12,82,420/-
towards Medical Reimbursement in favour of the applicant for treatment of her husband at the Apollo Hospi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
