Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K.HARIPAL, J, V. Rama Mathew, AM
Union of India represented by the Secretary to Government of India, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions – Appellant
Versus
Smilna Sudhakar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review application must address prior decision's grounds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. review is limited to correcting apparent errors. (Para 3) |
| 3. tribunal's discretion in review is constrained. (Para 4) |
This application having been heard on 1st August, 2025 the Tribunal on 21st August 2025 delivered the following :
O R D E R
HON'BLE Ms.V.RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER M.A.No.180/104/2025 has been filed to condone the delay of
49 days in re-presenting the R.A. The Tribunal has passed the order in the O.A on 26.09.2024. As per Rule 17(1) of the CAT (Procedure) Rules, 1987, no application for review shall be entertained unless it is filed within thirty days from the date of receipt of copy of the order sought to be reviewed. Certified copy has been received on 01.10.2024. Accordingly, review application must be filed on 30.10.2024. However, the R.A was filed by the review applicants with defects on 30.10.2024. After curing the defects, the R.A along with M.A.No.180/104/2025 to condone the delay was re-presented on 30.01.2025. The delay in re-presenting the R.A has not been satisfactorily explained. M.A to condone the delay in re-presenting the R.A is accordingly dismissed.
2. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
