Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Ranjit More, Chairman, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Arvind – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. justification for condonation of delay is required under strict scrutiny. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's interpretation of the applicant's situation and dismissal suitability. (Para 3 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. the case application was dismissed due to insufficient grounds for delay. (Para 9 , 10) |
Per: Justice Ranjit More, Chairman MA No. 2730/2025 in OA No. 2443/2025(Condonation of delay)
Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present Miscellaneous Application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1180 days in filing the Original Application.
3. The impugned order under challenge was passed on 19.06.2019. The statutory period of limitation of one year expired on 18.06.2020. Therefore, the Original Application ought to have been filed on or before 18.06.2020.
4. It is the case of the applicant that the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 is liable to be excluded in computation of limitation in view of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 10.01.2022 in Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020. The present OA was filed on 24.05.2025 along with the instant application seeking con
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
