Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, A
Sourabh Luthra – Appellant
Versus
Government of N.C.T. Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the applicants' contractual positions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal claims and rights of the applicants. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents' counterarguments and legal stance. (Para 5) |
| 4. court analysis of the issues and legal principles involved. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. ratio decidendi regarding replacement of contractual employees. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. final conclusions and orders of the tribunal. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A): -
By way of the present O.A., filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, the applicants (13 in number), in Para 8 of the O.A., have prayed for the following reliefs: -
“a) Quashing and setting aside of OIC-Estt. Branch-PHQ upload memo no. F.18(26)/Estt./PHQ/2025/CDNo. 3799530/2947 dated 25.04.2025 with annexed thereto advertisement notice-2025 [Annexure A-1];
b) As usual continuation of the contractual employments of the Applicants with all consequential reliefs and benefits, including pay and allowances for the intermittent period i.e. 01.04.2025 to till rejoining of the Applicants;
Any other or further order or direction to grant complete relief to the applicants.”
2. Pursuant to not
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
