Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. SWAMINATHAN, Member (J), SISIR KUMAR RATHO, Member(A)
K.Rengaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant alleged unfair dismissal based on a forged community certificate. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. fair inquiry procedures must be adhered to in disciplinary actions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. the authenticity of the community certificate was verified against procedural guidelines. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. producing a fake certificate is considered grave misconduct. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Sisir Kumar Ratho, Member(A))
In the instant OA, the applicant seeks the following relief:-
“To call for the records of the 2nd respondent in its No.7930/VIG/395/2015 dated 29.6.2017 as confirmed by the 1st respondent in its No.18584(890)/Per/Disc. dated 6.12.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant with all consequential and attendant benefits including backwages and pass such other order or orders as maybe deemed fit and thus render justice. ”
2. Brief facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, are as follows:
2.1 The Applicant belongs to the Scheduled Tribe viz, Kattunaicken Community. Based on a community certificate issued to him on 18.08.1993 by the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Thenkasi, the Applicant was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
