Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial), Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (Administrative)
Umesh Chandra Tripathi, Ashok Pandey, Basant Singh, Ashok, Raj Narayan Yadav, R.P. Singh, Siya Ram, Alok Sonwani – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Communication, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of applicants' service and eligibility for promotions. (Para 3) |
| 3. clarification on educational eligibility based on past standards. (Para 4) |
| 4. counterarguments regarding the non-validity of claimed qualifications. (Para 5) |
| 5. arguments supporting applicants’ claims to eligibility. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. court observations on previous rulings affirming applicants' rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 7. emphasis on the principle of non-retrospectivity in administrative orders. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 8. final ruling and directive to restore benefits. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 9. conclusion of the case outcome. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
Heard Mr. Santosh Tripathi, assisted by Shri D.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Anil , learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:
(i) This Hon’ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 22.12.2018 issued by the respondent-5.
(ii) This Hon’ble Tribunal may kindly be ple
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
