Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SURESH KUMAR BATRA, J, RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, A
Vinod Kumar, IPS – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed under administrative tribunal act (Para 1) |
| 2. factual matrix of promotions in police services (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. applicant's arguments regarding grading and promotion (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal framework governing promotions from sps to ips (Para 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. assessment procedures used by selection committee (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. clarification on 'good' grading not being adverse (Para 24 , 26 , 29) |
| 7. distinction between state and all india service promotion procedures (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. affirmation of selection committee's authority (Para 34 , 36) |
| 9. dismissal of the original application (Para 37) |
ORDER
Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA MEMBER (J):-
1. The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief:-
(i) To quash proceedings of the Selection Committee for Vacancy Year and Select List for induction to IPS for years 2017, 2018 and 2019 dated 22.03.2021 (Annexure A-1) to the extent it relates to applicant and private respondents,, being illegal and arbitrary.
(ii) To quash MHA notification No.F.No.1-14011/14/2020-IPS I (E)(1)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
